Skip to main content
OS × Tracking · Applicant Tracking Infrastructure

Hiring infrastructure for teams that actually operate.

Most ATS systems were built for HR departments running corporate hiring cycles. OS × Tracking was built inside a working staffing operation — pipeline, review, file management, and team communication unified into a single operational environment. No enterprise overhead. No template workflows. Configured per team.

Request accessDemo coming soon
Live · Limited Availability
Why we built this

Off-the-shelf hiring software is bloated for some teams and brittle for others.

The teams we work with need an ATS that handles real candidate movement, real file review, and real internal communication — without paying enterprise license fees for features they’ll never use. OS × Tracking started as the system Sequoyah Staffing’s team runs daily. We refined it until it could ship for any small-to-mid hiring operation that’s outgrown spreadsheets but isn’t ready for the price tag and rigidity of enterprise platforms.

Operational capabilities

Five buckets. One operational surface.

Each bucket represents a specific operational outcome the system delivers — not a feature dump.

Pipeline and movement

  • Six-stage pipeline (new → under review → interview → offer → hired → rejected) with inline-edit pills
  • Real-time pipeline counts on every dashboard, scoped per role
  • Optimistic updates with conflict resolution when two recruiters edit the same candidate simultaneously
  • Pipeline visible to recruiters and admins, intentionally hidden from the applicant

Communication and coordination

  • 1:1 recruiter-applicant messaging with real-time typing indicators and read receipts
  • Thread keyed to the applicant — reassigning recruiters preserves the full conversation history
  • File-request bubbles — recruiters can send a message and attach a task in one action; applicants see an "Upload" button that flips to "Uploaded" on completion
  • Manual email reminders for unread messages, with cooldown logic and recipient-activity awareness
  • Admin read-only moderation across every thread

File management with antivirus enforcement

  • PDF-only uploads with double-layer validation (MIME type + magic-byte check)
  • Every file scanned by self-hosted antivirus before it can be opened — files never leave the trust boundary
  • Quarantined files have their storage object deleted immediately; only the audit record remains
  • 24-hour soft-delete recovery window — accidental deletions are reversible
  • Short-lived signed URLs (15-second TTL) — leaked links are unusable almost immediately
  • Five file categories with three review statuses (pending, reviewed, rejected); rejections require a reason

Onboarding and task automation

  • Per-applicant onboarding checklist auto-assigned at registration
  • File uploads auto-complete matching tasks (no double-entry)
  • Custom task assignment — admins can target a specific applicant or recruiter with a one-off task
  • File-request tasks sent via chat in one action
  • Review tasks auto-generated for recruiters when an applicant uploads
  • Re-upload tasks auto-generated for applicants when a file is rejected (carries the rejection reason as context)

Audit, security, and operational visibility

  • Per-applicant activity timeline showing every meaningful action (uploads, status changes, file views, message reminders, quarantine events, etc.)
  • Date-bucketed grouping (Today / Yesterday / Last 7 days / Last 30 days / Older)
  • Snapshot architecture — actor name + role + file name captured at write time, so entries stay readable after users or files are deleted
  • Row-level security on every table with default-deny policies
  • Per-route rate limiting with friendly countdown messages
  • Invitation-only onboarding with 256-bit cryptographically strong tokens
How it’s sold

Scoped to the operation. Not the org chart.

OS × Tracking is sold as a custom engagement — not a per-seat subscription. Most ATS platforms scale cost by recruiter count, which punishes growing teams for the wrong reason. We scope each engagement around team size, candidate volume, and which capabilities matter most to your operation. No hidden user fees. No "premium tier" gates. The feature set you see is the feature set you get.Pricing is set during a short diagnostic call — we want to understand the operation before we quote it.

Great job, we have a brand new website thanks to this start up business. Well done.
Osmany DuanySequoyah Staffing
How it compares

Same outcome. Different shape.

A side-by-side, not adversarial. Hiring teams choose the system that fits their operation — here’s how the three options actually differ.

OS × Tracking — Built around how your team actually hires

  • Custom-configured per engagement; the feature set adjusts to your workflow
  • Real human onboarding from the team that built it
  • Antivirus-scanned uploads, default-deny row-level security, signed-URL file access
  • Pipeline + tasks + messaging + file review in one operational surface
  • Flat custom pricing — no per-seat surcharges as the team grows

The shift: hiring software that adapts to your operation instead of forcing your operation to adapt.

Enterprise ATS platforms — Built for large HR departments

  • Per-recruiter pricing that scales with team size, not value
  • Months-long onboarding and configuration projects
  • Feature bloat your team will never use
  • Procurement cycles, account-management overhead, contract minimums

Pricing: $100–$300+ per recruiter per month, plus implementation fees.

DIY ATS — spreadsheets + email

  • No real cost on paper
  • No pipeline visibility, no audit trail, no file scanning, no role separation
  • Hand-offs lost in inboxes; candidates fall through the cracks
  • Real cost shows up as missed hires and rework

"Free" until you count the candidates that never made it through.

Live with

OS × Tracking runs daily inside Sequoyah Staffing — the staffing operation we partnered with to build it. The team uses it as their primary hiring system. Additional limited-access slots are rolling out through 2026, prioritized for operators whose workflow fits the system’s architecture.

Demo coming soon
How it fits with the ecosystem

Stands alone today. Connects with OS × Inbox, OS × Workspace, and OS × Flow as those ship.

OS × Tracking is fully operational on its own. As the rest of the OS × ecosystem ships, integration points open — candidate-to-client hand-offs through OS × Workspace, communication aggregation through OS × Inbox, automated approval chains through OS × Flow. None of this requires the rest of the stack to be useful today.

Ready to evaluate?

Request access to OS × Tracking.

A short conversation tells us whether the fit makes sense. If it does, we’ll talk pricing, configuration, and onboarding. If it doesn’t, we’ll say so — and point you to a system that might.